Kazakhstan’s Eighteen-Billion-Euro Green Calculation

An energy transition platform backed by international lenders promises to replace coal with renewables, but success depends on market realities rather than institutional acronyms.

By

Kazakhstan’s Eighteen-Billion-Euro Green Calculation

Global multilateral development banks love a grand blueprint. Kazakhstan is now stepping onto the climate-finance stage with "QaJET", a just energy transition platform launched alongside the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The price tag for this ambitious undertaking is set at $20 billion (around €17.4 billion), aimed at overhauling an economy where fossil fuels currently generate approximately 85 percent of electricity.

The initiative, set for its formal unveiling at the COP31 summit in Antalya, outlines a massive reallocation of capital. Roughly €8.7 billion is ticketed for 10 gigawatts of new renewable capacity by 2035. Another €4.35 billion is allocated to integrate these intermittent sources into the grid, while the final quarter targets transport, industrial electrification, and smart energy systems. On paper, the blueprint promises to trim annual emissions by over 20 million tonnes, representing about 7 percent of the country’s energy-related output.

Capital is already trickling into concrete ventures. French giant TotalEnergies, alongside local partners, is developing the 1-gigawatt Mirny wind farm in the Zhambyl region. Equipped with 150 turbines and a 600-megawatt-hour battery system, the facility is slated for 2028 and relies on a 25-year power purchase contract with the state-owned Financial Settlement Centre for Renewable Energy. Separately, the EBRD is extending a loan of up to 102 billion tenge (€194 million) to Alatau Zharyk Company to modernise distribution systems around Almaty.

Yet beneath these impressive headline figures lies the sheer complexity of heavy-handed infrastructure planning. Kazakhstan’s government is reaching out to a vast queue of international donors, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, and various global funds. Bureaucratic bodies are quick to promise smooth transitions, but the practical hurdles are formidable. Workers in coal-heavy regions like Karaganda, North Kazakhstan, and East Kazakhstan face massive economic restructuring, while existing combined heat and power plants require expensive modernisations.

While competitive auctions since 2018 have helped lower tariffs, the fundamental vulnerabilities of political energy schemes remain. Yerlan Ramazanov from the EBRD points to natural resources and legal frameworks as strengths, noting that the state off-taker has historically paid on time. However, severe limits in grid capacity and supply balancing persist. Managing volatile renewable power requires strict regulatory frameworks for battery storage that remain work in progress.

Kazakhstan aims for carbon neutrality by 2060, contingent on foreign backing. Whether international development machinery and state-managed price guarantees can deliver a reliable grid remains an open question, as state platforms rarely move as cleanly as their spreadsheets suggest.

Written by Thorben Thiede thorben.thiede@alpineweekly.com