
The Burden of Ancient Bling: Hollywood Vanity Meets the Antiquities Market
An actor's choice to wear first-millennium Persian artefacts to a London film promotion exposes the murky realities of the global trade in historical treasures.

Hollywood promotional tours are rarely known for their historical accuracy, but the recent photocall for the cinematic adaptation of The Odyssey achieved a special kind of geographical dissonance. Actor Zendaya, cast as the Greek goddess Athena, stepped in front of London photographers adorned in gold medallion plaques dating back to the first millennium BC. The irony of promoting a Greek myth while wearing ancient Persian artefacts was entirely lost on her entourage. Instead, the sartorial choice triggered a fierce clash between the luxury antiquities market and cultural heritage campaigners.
The jewellery originates from the Ziwiye hoard, a trove discovered in northwestern Iran during the late 1940s. These ancient plaques were acquired by Mayfair dealer Barron London from local jeweller Glenn Spiro, who mounted the millennia-old gold with modern diamonds. For the Mayfair retailers, transforming archaeological finds into high-end accessories is standard business. The gallery insists the pieces simply encourage a wider appreciation of ancient Persian goldsmiths and their remarkable craftsmanship.
Heritage investigators are entirely unconvinced by this noble framing. Romina Frohar, founder of the Forensic Archive of Iran, initiated a petition demanding Barron London publish the complete provenance of the plaques. Her organisation calls for the dealer to reveal their legal compliance checks, allow physical examination of the items, and suspend the sale. Frohar argues that legal possession alone does not erase the cultural claims of the population whose history the objects represent.
Christos Tsirogiannis, an expert at the Swiss Federal Office of Culture, expressed astonishment that the actor's public relations machinery failed to intervene, pointing out the macabre possibility that the items were looted from an ancient burial site. Yet the legal reality of such items is notoriously murky. Simon Mackenzie of Victoria University of Wellington notes that while many nations now classify unauthorised excavation as theft, these regulations are rarely retroactive. In jurisdictions like Iran, establishing the exact date a theft rule became applicable provides endless fodder for legal manoeuvring.
This controversy exposes a thriving parallel market where history is routinely commodified. Anyone with a few hundred pounds can purchase Hellenistic garnet earrings online, while auction houses deal in astronomical sums. In 2018, Christie’s sold a relief of the neo-Assyrian king Ashurnasirpal II for nearly 31 million dollars. Historical ownership disputes are hardly new, echoing the 1849 surrender of the Koh-i-Noor diamond by the ten-year-old maharajah Duleep Singh to Queen Victoria.
There is, however, an accidental utility to celebrity vanity. When A-listers borrow from the rare treasure trade, they subject these artefacts to intense global scrutiny. A similar incident occurred in 2018 when Kim Kardashian posed beside the gilded Egyptian coffin of Nedjemankh. The resulting publicity allowed experts to identify the four million dollar museum acquisition as a stolen artefact smuggled out of Egypt in 2011. Hollywood's insatiable appetite for exclusive bling remains the antiquities market's most effective, if entirely unwitting, auditor.
Written by Andreas Hofer andreas.hofer@alpineweekly.com




