
Realpolitik at the UN: Abu Dhabi Makes Its Move for the Top Job
Lana Nusseibeh's bid for UN Secretary-General exposes the cynical mechanics of global diplomacy.

The United Nations routinely presents its leadership selection as a structured exercise in global consensus. The reality is a pragmatic game of backroom alignment among veto-wielding powers. The entry of Lana Nusseibeh into the race to succeed António Guterres, whose second term concludes on December 31, 2026, illustrates those dynamics with unusual clarity. Nominated by Emirati President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the experienced diplomat enters a contested field that now numbers seven candidates.
Nusseibeh served as her country's UN ambassador from 2013 to 2024 before becoming minister of state, a position from which she has now taken a leave of absence to focus on her campaign. While regional rotation traditions suggested that the next Secretary-General should hail from Latin America and the Caribbean, real political authority rests with the 15-member Security Council, where nine votes and zero vetoes from the permanent five—Britain, China, France, Russia, and the United States—are required. Analysts like Richard Gowan of the International Crisis Group observe that a candidacy rolled out with PR support from New York-based firm Teneo implies prior assurances from those key players.
That political viability will be tested against institutional criticism. Human Rights Watch has documented ongoing domestic restrictions on expression and assembly within the Emirates. More acutely, UN panels of experts and Amnesty International have pointed to Emirati military support for the Rapid Support Forces fighting in Sudan, where UN officials have reported atrocities in El Fasher. Though the Emirati government firmly rejects allegations of supplying weapons to any warring party, critics such as Nathaniel Raymond of Yale’s Humanitarian Research Lab point to a clear conflict of interest for any candidate tied to a state facing such accusations.
Yet inside the diplomatic circuit, transactional effectiveness frequently outweighs normative concerns. Supporters highlight Nusseibeh’s backing of humanitarian relief into Gaza and the Emirates’ role in the Abraham Accords. Former American national security adviser Brett McGurk praised her capacity to deliver results across political divides, while evangelical leader Johnnie Moore characterized her as one of the few figures capable of building Council consensus. With Latin American frontrunners facing early discouragement votes in confidential straw polls, the Emirati entry offers major powers a familiar, highly networked alternative.
Written by Freya Stensrud freya.stensrud@alpineweekly.com




