Oct 21, 12:01 PM

The Gospel of Kindness and Resource Taxes

David Pocock presents a moralizing agenda of export levies and independent alliances to bypass Canberra's two-party system.

By

The Gospel of Kindness and Resource Taxes

Independent Australian senator David Pocock took the podium at the National Press Club not to announce a run for prime minister, but to pitch a structural shakeup of Canberra's political establishment. Addressing journalists and allies, the former rugby player presented an ambitious agenda that seeks to bypass the traditional two-party system through targeted economic levies and an expanded network of crossbench candidates.

The representative for the Australian Capital Territory made clear that his political ambitions extend far beyond individual political office. Instead of pursuing executive leadership himself, Pocock aims to disrupt established party machinery by organizing a looser collective of independent candidates across federal electorates. Drawing inspiration from existing community networks such as Community Strong, he outlined plans to back independent campaigns in seats including Bean, Canberra, and Grayndler, the electorate currently held by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

To fund an expanded social safety net—encompassing boosted welfare allowances, aged care reforms, and additional home support packages—Pocock proposed two major fiscal interventions. He called for a 25 percent tax on gas exports, arguing that Australia currently permits foreign resource extraction without securing adequate financial returns for its citizens. Additionally, he suggested a 5 percent levy on data centres to harvest tax revenue from the expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure. When challenged on the necessity of budget discipline, his argument was straightforward: government can either cut spending or grow its revenue.

Alongside his economic demands, Pocock called for a sharp cultural shift within federal parliament. Citing an alleged attack on independent MP Helen Haines and describing parliamentary question time as a disgrace, he advocated for greater transparency, mandatory lobbyist disclosures, and an end to undisclosed political meetings. In his view, raising parliamentary decorum is essential to restoring public faith in national political institutions.

Whether a loosely affiliated group of independent parliamentarians can successfully replace disciplined governance remains questionable. Taxing energy exports and technology infrastructure offers an easy path to expanded revenue on paper, but turning moral earnestness into durable policy requires far more than crossbench posturing.

Written by Thorben Thiede thorben.thiede@alpineweekly.com