Nov 11, 1:01 PM

Florida Court Allows Donald Trump's Defamation Lawsuit Against BBC to Proceed

A federal judge rejects the broadcaster's motion to dismiss the primary claim while throwing out a separate trade practice allegation.

By

Florida Court Allows Donald Trump's Defamation Lawsuit Against BBC to Proceed

A federal judge in Florida has allowed a 10 billion dollar defamation lawsuit filed by US President Donald Trump against the BBC to proceed to the next procedural stage. District Judge Jeffrey Kuntz rejected the British broadcaster's motion to dismiss the primary claim, while throwing out a secondary allegation concerning state trade laws.

In his order, Judge Kuntz established that the defamation allegations contained sufficient legal grounding to move forward, without issuing a ruling on the merits of the case. He noted that whether the plaintiff can substantiate the claims and demonstrate financial damages remains to be determined at summary judgment or trial. The court dismissed the secondary claim brought under Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, ruling that the television documentary did not constitute commercial speech.

The lawsuit centers on an episode of the BBC current affairs programme Panorama, which featured an edited sequence of a speech delivered by Trump near the US Capitol on 6 January 2021. Trump's filing alleges that the broadcaster deceptively combined two distinct sections of the address. The BBC later acknowledged in an apology that the broadcast had given a mistaken impression regarding a call to violent action.

The BBC had sought to dismiss the case, arguing that the program did not meet the legal criteria for defamation and was not accessible in the United States. Trump's lawyers previously conceded they lacked evidence showing the documentary was available in the US on streaming platforms such as BritBox or BBC Select. Following that admission, Trump agreed to remove BBC Studios, the commercial branch of the corporation, from the lawsuit after it confirmed it had no role in producing the documentary.

Trump publicly characterized the ruling as a major development on his Truth Social network on Tuesday. The broadcaster acknowledged the decision, with a spokesperson stating: We are surprised by this decision but respect the Court's authority and note the case will now proceed to the next stage. The representative added that the network remains confident in its legal position.

The judicial schedule mandates that Trump submit to questioning under oath by 11 December. This requirement follows a cancelled deposition, which Trump's team attributed to matters of national importance, while BBC lawyers noted in court filings that he had prioritized campaign activities in Georgia on that date.

Written by Freya Stensrud freya.stensrud@alpineweekly.com