
Legal Turf Wars in the Empire of Football
UEFA turns to American courts to arm a Swiss criminal case against Gianni Infantino

When international sports federations start weaponising foreign judiciaries against one another, public interest rarely turns on a sudden zeal for good governance. Rather, it reveals the friction of competing institutional fiefdoms. European football’s governing body, UEFA, has turned to an American federal court to gather legal ammunition against FIFA President Gianni Infantino. The target is a potential criminal prosecution in Switzerland, grounded in accusations of corporate shadow-boxing that would make a corporate raider blush.
At the heart of the maneuver lies an ex parte application filed in Florida, targeting two local FIFA entities: FIFA (AMERICAS), Inc. and FWC2026 US, Inc. UEFA is seeking documents and testimony regarding a now-scrapped venture known as FIFA Forward Enterprise. Under this proposed subsidiary, FIFA allegedly planned to carve out and transfer the lucrative commercial rights for the men’s, women’s, and Club World Cups. The underlying charge, which UEFA aims to take to Swiss prosecutors under Article 158 of the Swiss Criminal Code, is criminal mismanagement.
The narrative put forward by Nyon is simple enough. Infantino, along with a select circle of advisers and financiers, allegedly cooked up the multi-billion-dollar restructuring in absolute secrecy. The broader FIFA Council, regional confederations, and national associations were left entirely in the dark while the commercial crown jewels were quietly repositioned. UEFA contends that the Florida entities hold crucial evidence detailing how the project was conceived, valued, and ultimately approved behind closed doors.
That Swiss criminal law should become the chosen instrument for this power struggle is a neat irony. Switzerland has long offered international sports bureaucracies a comfortable, low-friction home, relying on a clean legal framework and a polite distance from heavy-handed intervention. Yet when internal rivalries boil over, even the most serene legal jurisdiction becomes a battleground. Relying on American pre-trial discovery mechanisms to feed Swiss prosecutors shows just how far European football executives are willing to go to clip Infantino’s wings.
Whether the Florida petition produces actionable evidence or merely prolongs an expensive political war remains an open question. What is indisputable is that the management of global football continues to resemble a closed cartel whose members only invoke transparency when it serves as a club to beat a rival.
Written by Sandy van Dongen sandy.vandongen@alpineweekly.com




