
The Swiss approach to a shattered mountain: Measure it, then pave it
Over a year after a massive rockslide in Blatten, engineers and academics are deploying an arsenal of sensors to quantify a disaster zone.

The Swiss Alps occasionally demonstrate exactly who is in charge. When a mountain crumbles, as it did over a year ago in the Lötschental village of Blatten, the immediate human reaction is panic. The subsequent Swiss reaction, naturally, is to deploy high-end surveying equipment and turn the catastrophe into a heavily monitored engineering project.
Today, the ruins of Blatten are buried under a massive debris cone of rock and ice. Rather than abandoning the site to the elements, a well-funded apparatus of academics and private contractors has transformed the disaster zone into an open-air laboratory. From a comfortable office at the mapping firm Terradata in Zurich, surveying engineer Mario Studer monitors the destruction virtually. An autonomous drone, housed in a box on the edge of the rockslide area, launches itself every fourteen days to photograph the rubble. While these flights occurred daily in the immediate aftermath, they now supply a steady, fortnightly stream of data used to generate precise three-dimensional models of the shifting terrain.
The sheer scale of the debris requires more than just aerial photography. The pile of earth and stone towers up to 35 meters above the valley floor. To understand the internal mechanics of this mass, Studer's team has drilled holes up to 25 meters deep into the cone, inserting highly sensitive temperature sensors.
The resulting data reveals a slow, hidden thaw. Remnants of the collapsed Birch Glacier are trapped inside the rubble. Beneath a thick, insulating layer of rock, the buried ice remains up to 15 meters thick. In areas where the protective layer of debris is thinner, measuring only two to three meters, the ice has already shrunk from six meters down to three. As the frozen core melts, leaving behind only sand and gravel, the entire structure sags and settles unevenly.
The academic sector is equally invested in this geological autopsy. Gleb Kabakovitch and Andreas Hüni from the University of Zurich's Geography Institute are mapping the surface composition using airborne spectrometers. Navigating the narrow Lötschental valley requires precise flight paths, allowing the researchers to distinguish between fine sand and massive boulders from above. Sand washes away rapidly, and areas with high sand content settle much faster than those dominated by solid rock. Kabakovitch notes that such granular insights are vital for predicting the future stability of the terrain.
All this meticulous observation serves a highly pragmatic, distinctly Swiss purpose: reconstruction. The vast amounts of collected data are deemed essential for rebuilding Blatten and constructing a new cantonal road directly over or around the volatile site. There is a certain naivety in the assumption that a mountain, having just demonstrated its destructive capacity, can be safely tamed by sufficient data collection. Hüni suggests that this heavily monitored rubble pile will act as a reference point for future natural catastrophes, forcing locals to learn how to coexist with sudden geological shifts. True to form, the well-oiled Swiss state system prefers to manage its disasters with precise geometry and expensive sensors, treating a shattered mountain not as a permanent warning, but as a temporary infrastructure hurdle waiting to be solved.
Written by Sandy van Dongen sandy.vandongen@alpineweekly.com




