
Diplomacy via Visa Denial: Washington Targets Chinese Influence in Fiji
By barring a Fiji-based director over bribery claims, the US State Department relies on border controls to contest Beijing's Pacific footprint.

Washington’s latest enforcement measure in the Pacific relies on border controls rather than traditional diplomacy. The United States State Department has barred Zhao Fugang, a Fiji-based director, along with his immediate family members, from entering American territory over allegations of corruption tied to Chinese interests.
According to official American press statements, Zhao abused his role as director of the Overseas Chinese Service Center by paying bribes to Fijian citizens. Washington asserts that these illicit payments were meant to advance Chinese government, commercial, and criminal objectives in Fiji. The US embassy in Suva framed the move around regional concerns, citing what it described as a broader pattern of criminal actors operating in the Pacific with ties to China.
The dispute reflects two starkly different explanations of Beijing's international operations. Chinese officials maintain that Overseas Chinese Service Centers exist solely to help citizens abroad with routine administrative tasks, such as renewing driving licenses. In contrast, human rights groups argue that such centers serve as apparatuses for Beijing to project power and target dissidents overseas.
This action follows earlier American efforts to counter Chinese presence in the region through similar mechanisms. In February, the Trump administration sanctioned two other Pacific island officials: Hokkons Baules, the president of Palau’s Senate, and Anderson Jibas, a former mayor in the Marshall Islands. US officials claimed both figures had created vulnerabilities that allowed Beijing to expand its foothold.
By turning visa policy into a counter-influence mechanism, Washington aims to penalize local intermediaries. Whether blocking entry to the United States changes the strategic calculations of small island nations remains a central policy question.
Written by Sandy van Dongen sandy.vandongen@alpineweekly.com




