
Corporate Ambition Meets Bureaucratic Revolt: The Fight for FIFA’s Future
Gianni Infantino’s aborted plan to sell a stake in the World Cup has cost him institutional support, but earned him the backing of an American political scion.

The global football establishment has never been particularly fond of sharing power, let alone revenue. When FIFA President Gianni Infantino floated the idea of selling off a slice of the World Cup’s commercial rights to private investors, the bureaucratic outrage was swift and severe.
Infantino’s aborted scheme centered on a new corporate vehicle designated as FIFA Forward Enterprise. The proposal envisioned offloading a twenty percent stake in the commercial and operational management of the World Cup and other major tournaments. Among the prospective buyers was Joshua Kushner, a prominent investor whose syndicate recently moved to acquire the Los Angeles Lakers. From a strictly financial perspective, leveraging private capital to maximize a tournament's untapped commercial potential is standard practice in modern sports. Yet, the plan triggered an immediate revolt among football's regional power brokers, forcing Infantino to abandon the initiative in late July.
Retreating on the privatization push has not insulated the FIFA president from the institutional fallout. A formidable coalition of regional confederations—including Europe's UEFA, North America's CONCACAF, and the Asian Football Confederation—has subsequently signaled a refusal to back Infantino in his upcoming re-election bid. They are joined by the national federations of England, Wales, the Republic of Ireland, and New Zealand. For these entrenched organizations, the prospect of ceding control to private equity represented an intolerable threat to their own influence over the sport's most lucrative asset.
Into this administrative power struggle steps an unexpected defender: Andrew Giuliani, the former executive director of the White House Task Force for the recently concluded World Cup. Rather than viewing Infantino's commercial ambitions as a misstep, Giuliani has dismissed the institutional backlash as petty jealousy masquerading as righteous indignation. Speaking to the sporting press, the son of the former New York mayor drew parallels between the opposition facing Infantino and the political targeting of former United States President Donald Trump.
According to Giuliani, the relentless commercialization of global sports is an inescapable reality, and Infantino should be judged on his broader success in elevating FIFA's financial standing rather than a single abandoned proposal. The current standoff highlights an ideological gulf at the heart of global football. On one side sits an administrative old guard fiercely protective of its traditional monopoly; on the other, a growing faction willing to treat the world's most popular sport as a conventional, highly lucrative corporate asset to be maximized by private capital.
Written by Freya Stensrud freya.stensrud@alpineweekly.com




