
When a Sick Note Becomes a State Failure
A North Rhine-Westphalia teacher has been off work since 2009, yet the bureaucracy only acted in 2025. Now the case is heading to court, with a fraud probe running in parallel.

German public administration has a gift for discovering problems only after they have been allowed to ferment for years. In North Rhine-Westphalia, that talent has now produced a case that reads like a manual on how not to run a school system: a teacher has been on sick leave since August 2009, has not taught since then, and was only medically examined in 2025.
That examination, carried out at the end of May, led the Düsseldorf district government to seek her retirement on the grounds of permanent incapacity for duty. The teacher is not accepting that quietly. She has filed suit at the Administrative Court in Düsseldorf, turning a long-brewing administrative embarrassment into a legal dispute with a very public audience.
Her last post was at Berufskolleg Wesel. The case had already drawn attention because the North Rhine-Westphalia Higher Administrative Court had criticised the authority’s years of inactivity as hard to understand. At the same time, it upheld the legality of the medical examination itself. Bureaucratic delay, in other words, was frowned upon; bureaucratic procedure was saved. A reassuring distinction, if one happens to be paid to make such distinctions.
The matter does not end with employment law. The Duisburg public prosecutor’s office is investigating the teacher on suspicion of commercial fraud. The suspicion is that she may have worked as a naturopath while officially off sick. In March, investigators searched her apartment and seized documents and electronic data carriers. Those materials are still being analysed. No indictment has been filed, no conviction has been secured, and the presumption of innocence remains intact.
The case became a national talking point last year, when the district government admitted that no medical examination had been arranged for years. That admission triggered disciplinary proceedings not only against the teacher, but also against a responsible person within the district government. It was a rare moment of administrative honesty, though not exactly the kind that inspires confidence in the machinery of the state.
What this episode ultimately shows is less about one teacher than about the condition of the public sector itself. If a case can sit untouched from 2009 until 2025, the problem is not merely one individual’s sick leave. It is a system that tolerated drift for far too long and now has to explain itself in court, under scrutiny from prosecutors, judges and the public alike. The bill for such negligence tends to arrive late, but it arrives all the same.
Written by Thorben Thiede thorben.thiede@alpineweekly.com




